Editorial Policy
Our editorial standard is to explain the evidence behind a stock teaser identification rather than repeat a promotion's promises. We distinguish source facts from interpretation, identify uncertainty and review reported errors. These standards guide articles, track records and calculators, but they are not a guarantee that every published statement is correct.
1. Independence from covered publishers
Publishers, companies and advertisers cannot buy a favorable reveal, suppress a conclusion or pay to have criticism removed. We are not paid by the newsletter publishers we cover. Coverage decisions should reflect reader interest, available evidence and the ability to verify claims, not the prospect of generating a dramatic headline. Naming a publisher is not an endorsement or a claim of affiliation. We judge specific claims and evidence rather than assuming every promotion from a source has the same quality. Readers should be able to distinguish an advertisement's wording from our own description and analysis of what that wording means.
2. Matching the hard clues
Research begins with the actual promotion and its date. We identify concrete clues such as revenue, acquisitions, products, locations, patents and named business relationships. We then compare those clues with public records and credible reporting. A reveal should identify one company only when all material hard clues fit. If several candidates remain plausible, the article should say so rather than force a single ticker. Marketing language, approximate numbers and old statistics require extra care. A superficial thematic match is not enough. Even a strong identification does not verify a publisher's future price target or establish that the underlying stock is worth buying.
3. Sources and second review
Primary sources such as SEC filings, official announcements and government data should support important factual claims where available. Company presentations can explain a business but also reflect management's preferred framing. News coverage can provide context and identify questions for further checking. A second editor checks tickers, important figures, dates and the logic connecting clues to the proposed company before publication. Review should include units, reporting periods and whether a number refers to revenue, profit or a forecast. Links should help readers find the supporting material. Where evidence cannot resolve a point, the article should describe the uncertainty instead of inventing precision.
4. Holdings and trading restrictions
Writers may not trade a stock covered by their reveal during the seventy-two hours before or after publication. Relevant holdings must be disclosed with the article. A disclosed position does not make a conclusion correct, and a lack of ownership does not establish neutrality. The aim is to make material interests visible and reduce incentives to benefit from publication timing. Writers should raise conflicts before work proceeds rather than relying on a disclosure after the fact. These standards do not eliminate every possible bias or market influence. Readers should still examine the evidence independently and never treat an author's financial interest as a reason to copy a trade.
5. Track records and tool assumptions
Performance summaries should identify the observation date and comparison window. Our stated approach compares picks from the closing price on the teaser's first-run date at thirty, ninety and three hundred sixty-five days, with an S&P 500 comparison over the same window. Missing history, market holidays, splits, dividends and unavailable securities can affect implementation and should not be silently ignored. A measured return is not necessarily an executable trading result. Calculator pages should explain inputs, units and important exclusions. Models based on US federal tax, retirement or benefit rules need current references and clear limits rather than an implication that every household exception is included.
6. Corrections and reader contributions
Send correction requests with the page address, the disputed statement and a source that supports your concern. We review the evidence rather than deciding by the number or tone of complaints. Material factual corrections should be noted on the article so readers can understand what changed. Minor spelling or formatting edits do not necessarily need a separate notice. New developments may justify an update without making the original reporting wrong as of its date. Tips are welcome, but publication is not guaranteed and unsolicited messages should not contain confidential client information. We do not promise a universal review deadline or continuous monitoring of every older article.
About this free publication
Globull.com is a free finance publication focused on the United States. Readers do not need an account, subscription, paid plan or login to read our articles or use our tools. Our coverage centers on stocks listed on US exchanges, including the NYSE and Nasdaq. Dollar amounts refer to US dollars unless a page says otherwise. Availability to readers elsewhere does not mean our content follows another country's investment, tax, privacy or consumer protection rules. Consider the location, date and purpose of each article before applying it to your own circumstances. A ticker identification is an explanation of a promotion, not an instruction to trade.
Reading figures in context
Financial information depends on assumptions and timing. A share price, tax threshold, company name or promotional claim can change after a page is published. Read the surrounding explanation rather than relying on a search snippet, table cell or isolated sentence. Calculators provide estimates based on the inputs and formulas described on the tool page. Tax, retirement and Social Security examples concern US federal rules unless otherwise stated, and do not cover every exception or state requirement. Check important facts against current official sources. Neither a free tool nor a detailed article can replace a review of your complete financial circumstances by an appropriately qualified professional.
Browser features and outside services
Calculator entries are processed in your browser rather than submitted to Globull for calculation. If you choose to save a calculator scenario, local storage on that browser keeps the saved values until they are cleared. This is not a cloud account or a backup service. Site storage is limited to essential functions and locally saved scenarios, not advertising profiles or analytics tracking cookies. Loading an image supplied through an image API can still send a network request to that service. External links open resources operated by others. Review our Privacy and Cookie policies for the distinction between browser storage, ordinary network requests and information you voluntarily email us.
Questions about this page
Contact contact@globull.com if you need clarification, find a broken reference or believe this page contains an error. Include the page address and enough context for us to understand the issue. Do not send account passwords, Social Security numbers, brokerage credentials or complete tax returns. We do not need those details to review an editorial or website question. A message to the publication does not establish an adviser-client relationship or guarantee a particular response time. We may revise explanations as our practices, tools or applicable requirements change. Read the relevant policy again when a new question arises, and keep your own copy if you need a record of wording you relied on.